Norm M Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 I was fishing and doing well enough with a rattlebait on a current seam. there was another guy further down not catching anything. He was using dry flies. I suggested that he pass by and fish the next seam with a streamer or something he could strip aggressively as the fish were responding to my lure. he told me he would rather fish like a gentleman and remain fishless than to use crude tactics and lures like I was. He told me that a gentleman only uses feathers to catch fish. I responded that I knew many fine gentlemen who fly fish and use other materials such as animal fur, flashabou and living rubber in their creations. He responded that such materials were an anathema to the sport and he would not deign designate those who would employ such as fly fishermen. I no longer had any to response as I couldn't fathom how one material could be more gentlemanly than another, so I left to find another spot. I still have not come to grips with how someone could rationalize such a thing in his mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjtroester Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 really!? if fishing drys makes him happy, so what? he wasn't crowding anybody. maybe it isn't all to do with catching and comparing the size of his fish to the other guys fish. not clear here who is doing the rationalizing. timothy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob G Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 Norm, I wish everyone was like that guy ! Then I could clean up with my other flies and baits. To each his own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 He he. Great story. Would have been sweet to tie on the beer can lure and proceed to chat with him.. "What are you using?" "Bud can..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jude Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 Sounds like the perfect fly fisherman cliche. I have to repeat what Timothy said: really?!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gillio Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 He he. Great story. Would have been sweet to tie on the beer can lure and proceed to chat with him.. "What are you using?" "Bud can..." Maybe even a beer can bobber and a worm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim J Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 Wrong TJ "He told me that a gentleman only uses feathers to catch fish." This comment makes him the snobby tool he is. He is saying "if you don't fish my way you're not a _______" No one cares if he only wants to fish with whatever or catch whatever. His comment says "whoever isn't fishing my way isn't a gentleman" If that's not a snobby tool? I think the defense mechanism of some fly fishermen gets going really fast. No one gives a crap except the guys who think their way is always the best. Give it up already. Norm was letting him go by to the next spot and fish and he could have just said thanks and fished how he wanted to, but instead he's got to give Norm a little lecture on the gentlemanly way to fish. tool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjtroester Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 good lord! now that i have my familiar (Wrong TJ) badge on, i feel better. i know my place . i just hate anyone to think i would agree with someone else to be (Right TJ). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm M Posted May 26, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 I tried to do the right thing and offered some advice which he was free to take or ignore. No skin off me either way. I don't care how any one fishes as long as it's legal. I didn't offer up the air of my method is superior to all others, he did that. as I said I know many gentleman and a few not so gentlemanly that fly fish. they use a wide assortment of materials to craft their flies and don't feel compelled to pass judgement on the materials others may use. i have fished long enough and with a wide enough variety of fishermen to know there is no stereotypical fly, spin, cast. spincast of canepoling guy. That he thought my methods crude amused me. that he thought a certain type of material more gentlemanly than any others puzzled me. If only fishing drys is what he enjoys, dig, that's his movie. Laying a bad rap on others movie is just courting bad karma. i was just hoping some one more in tune with the whole fly fishing scene could enlighten me on the feathers good, animal fur bad thing is a more prevalent attitude than I ever would have suspected within the community that's all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gillio Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 I believe in some people's minds there is a hierarchy in the world of fishing that goes something like this (with many divisions within each group): 1. Those who fish with split cane flyrods and feathered dry flies only (in which case the fellow on the river with you would be a lowly peasant if he were not toting a Thomas and Thomas). 2. The flyfisherman. 3. The bass fisherman in the fiberglass bass boat. 4. The baitfisher in his john boat. 5. The spin or baitcaster walking the shoreline. 6. The bait fisherman on the shoreline relaxing on his fishing chair with a beer in hand (I suppose a microbrew of some sort would give you more status than a Schlitz). 7. The trot liner. 8. The jug fisherman. 9. The limbliner. 10. The yo-heaver. 11. The hogger, noodler, or whatever you call it when you stick your hand under a rock and grab the fish (Jude, help me with this one). I personally have no prejudice here as I have been seen doing most of the above. Unfortunately I have never fished with a Thomas and Thomas and I am too chicken to stick my hand under a rock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim J Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 Schlitz. Now that's funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob G Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 Johnny G, love your list, though I might rate the jug fishermen above the trot liners since they're using "strike indicators" ha Norm, I really don't know the reasoning between feathers and fur. I do know some that prefer natural materials vs. synthetics simply because of the traditionalism and aesthetics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm M Posted May 26, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 Ok . so it may be a thing about tradition. he had a cane fly rod, no idea if it was a Thomas & Thomas. I can see the natural vs. synthetic from that view point. I still don't completely get the feathers vs. fur as I thought fur was part of the long standing tradition of creating flies. To me that would be like saying balsa is superior to cedar for hard baits. Both have their place and one may outshine the other in certain situations but using one does not make it inherently more gentlemanly than the other If I ever acquire a Thomas & Thomas, say at a garage sale, could I bring it to a cast and compare ?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gillio Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 Ok . so it may be a thing about tradition. he had a cane fly rod, no idea if it was a Thomas & Thomas. I can see the natural vs. synthetic from that view point. I still don't completely get the feathers vs. fur as I thought fur was part of the long standing tradition of creating flies. To me that would be like saying balsa is superior to cedar for hard baits. Both have their place and one may outshine the other in certain situations but using one does not make it inherently more gentlemanly than the other If I ever acquire a Thomas & Thomas, say at a garage sale, could I bring it to a cast and compare ?. Only if your practice fly is made of feathers . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikea Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 What kills me is the snobbery inside an already niche sport such as fly fishing. Its now not enough that you fly fish, your not really fly fishing unless your spey casting and swinging, or using bamboo and drys only. GET OVER IT!! Its fishing sheeesh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Dodge Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 All I know is a "gentleman" would never toss a Chug Bug. End of story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve S. Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 All I know is a "gentleman" would never toss a Chug Bug. End of story. Ha ha I love that one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom L Posted May 27, 2014 Report Share Posted May 27, 2014 I can see the natural vs. synthetic from that view point. I still don't completely get the feathers vs. fur as I thought fur was part of the long standing tradition of creating flies. To me that would be like saying balsa is superior to cedar for hard baits. Both have their place and one may outshine the other in certain situations but using one does not make it inherently more gentlemanly than the other The feather vs. fur arguments dated back since G.E.M. Skues time when he published "Minor Tactics of the Chalk Stream" in 1910. Skues pioneered fishing wet flies and nymphs subsurface which were deemed unacceptable at the time. The only acceptable way to fish was "dry fly - upstream" only at the time. A typical dry fly was tied with feathers and a nymph was tied with furs. Obviously, there are still quite a lot of people following that "dry fly or died". I respect people's choice of fishing "dry fly only" or any other fishing techniques. But to look down and call other people's fishing technique crude!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgoodmanii Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Been following this thread for a couple days. I'm not sure what is trying to be communicated by this anecdote or if it is a factual account. But what I can't figure out is why such an elitist fly fisherman was on an Illinois stream tossing dries for warm water fish. Something is not adding up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gillio Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Been following this thread for a couple days. I'm not sure what is trying to be communicated by this anecdote or if it is a factual account. But what I can't figure out is why such an elitist fly fisherman was on an Illinois stream tossing dries for warm water fish. Something is not adding up. Nice point. He obviously isn't all he thinks he is. I would guess a native brook trout never set fin in the 3K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jude Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Been following this thread for a couple days. I'm not sure what is trying to be communicated by this anecdote or if it is a factual account. But what I can't figure out is why such an elitist fly fisherman was on an Illinois stream tossing dries for warm water fish. Something is not adding up. Hold your cards. We have a bingo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Would have been awesome if Joe Dry Fly tied into a bowfin or big K3 gar. He might have to slime his high-end gear... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm M Posted May 29, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 I have no idea why he was there but he was. He never knocked fishing for smallmouth, he only stated that a gentleman only fishes with feathers. Maybe he has champagne tastes and a beer budget. As to what was being communicated , it was my puzzlement at how one material used in a lure could be more gentlemanly than another material. If any one thinks it is a shot at fly fisherman they are mistaken, Did I not state I knew many gentlemen that fly fish. He was the one that denigrated them for using materials he considered an anathema to the sport. All I sought was enlightenment about his seemingly incomprehensible statement to me. Relax, I don't care how you fish, don't think that any particular method is superior to others, do it legally and enjoy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.