Question about waders
Posted 20 March 2012 - 06:27 AM
The question is...do you think it's good practice for a fly shop to sell a pair of 2009 waders in April of 2011 without telling me that they were an older pair? Yes, the waders were 'new' but perhaps they suffered some deterioration from time.
I'd really appreciate feedback on this before I take further action.
Posted 20 March 2012 - 07:30 AM
Posted 20 March 2012 - 08:09 AM
Mere time shouldn't cause any deterioration.Since you didn't register the purchase Simms understandably assumed the 2009 waders were an older purchase.The receipt will clear that up in your favor.
I recently sent in my 2 yr old heavily used pair for some minor leak repair for which Simms charged only $31.I've found them to be much less leak prone than previous ones I've had from Hodgman,LL Bean,Cabelas ,Dan Bailey.
Posted 20 March 2012 - 08:31 AM
Posted 20 March 2012 - 05:40 PM
Posted 24 April 2012 - 07:51 PM
Posted 26 April 2012 - 01:25 PM
receipt in hand and received new ones with no problem,one pair was over a year old.On the other hand when my Simms boots
fell apart all they gave me was 40 percent off a new pair.That may sound like a fair offer but that was off their retail price.In effect
the replacement pair cost me $100.Last year I picked up a pair of Cabela's Dry Plus Premium waders for $110 with a discount
coupon,I love them.With the front storage pockets I have found I am wearing my vest less and less.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users